Skip to main content
Tool Automation freemium active 8-8.9
8/10 Strong
Active

$0-$29+/month

Try Make free

Editorial · no paid placements

The call

Make is the cost-efficient visual automation platform. Pick it for complex branching workflows and high volume at a fraction of Zapier's price. Skip for the widest integration library (Zapier wins) or open-source self-hosting (n8n).

  • Buy if Complex multi-step workflows with branching and loops
  • Pick $0-$29+/month
  • Skip if Teams needing 9,000+ integrations

Editorial score

Unweighted average of 4 axes · confidence high

  • Utility 8/10

    How much real work it can do for a competent operator, end to end.

  • Value 9/10

    What you get for the dollar relative to the closest alternative.

  • Moat 7/10

    How hard it would be for a competitor to replicate the underlying advantage.

  • Longevity 8/10

    How likely the product is to still be best-in-class 24 months out.

Key facts

  1. Best For Make is best for teams that want visual, multi-step automation across SaaS apps, APIs, routers, iterators, and data transformation without owning custom orchestration code.
    high Stable 2026-05-13 Make Help Center
  2. Pricing Anchor Make pricing is credit-based, so cost governance should model scenario frequency, module count, and AI-module usage rather than only the number of workflows. Headline rates dropped in May 2026 (Core to $9, Pro to $16, Teams to $29).
    high Volatile 2026-05-13 Make pricing
  3. Watch Out For The main buyer risk is underestimating credit burn from high-frequency scenarios, nested routes, polling, retries, and AI steps; audit operations before migrating mission-critical workflows.
    high Drifts 2026-05-13 Make pricing
  4. Integration Surface Make publishes a broad integration catalog and is strongest when buyers need packaged app connectors plus custom HTTP/API steps in the same scenario.
    high Drifts 2026-05-13 Make app integrations
  5. Ai Agent Surface Make now positions AI agents as part of its automation platform, so comparisons should distinguish deterministic scenarios from agentic workflows that can consume extra credits.
    high Drifts 2026-05-13 Make AI Agents

Make is the visual workflow automation platform built by the team formerly known as Integromat. Scenarios combine drag-and-drop modules into flows with routers, iterators, aggregators, and error handlers. 2,000+ integrations, plus HTTP and webhook modules for anything else.

Pricing runs $0 to $29+/month after a May 2026 price drop. Credits replaced operations as the billing unit in August 2025 to reflect AI-module cost.

System Verdict

Pick Make if workflows branch, loop, or run at volume. Credit-based billing costs roughly a third of Zapier at equivalent workloads, and the May 2026 price drop widened the gap. The canvas handles routers and iterators natively instead of bolting them on. Native modules for GPT, Claude, and Gemini sit alongside SaaS connectors in one scenario.

Skip it if the integration library matters more than the canvas. Zapier ships 9,000+ connectors to Make’s 2,000+. Non-technical users land faster on Zapier. Regulated teams needing self-host belong on n8n.

Who pays which tier: Free for 1,000-credit testing, Core $9/mo for most teams, Pro $16/mo for priority execution and custom variables, Teams $29/mo for collaboration, Enterprise custom for governance and scale.

Key Facts

Core productScenarios (visual multi-step workflows)
Integration count2,000+ apps
AI modulesOpenAI frontier models · Claude Opus 4.7 · Gemini 3.1 Pro · Stability AI
Billing unitCredits (replaced operations, August 2025)
PricingFree · Core $9 · Pro $16 · Teams $29 · Enterprise custom
Free tier1,000 credits/mo · 2 active scenarios · 15-min interval
Self-hostNone
Logic supportRouters, iterators, aggregators, error handlers, filters
Template library10,000+ community and official

Every data point above was verified against vendor documentation on 2026-05-13. See Sources.

What it actually is

A visual automation canvas where each app connector is a module and data flows through the pipes you draw. Scenarios trigger on events and pass structured data through routers (branching), iterators (loops), and aggregators (collection) before landing in downstream modules.

Credits replaced operations as the billing unit in August 2025. Each module execution consumes credits. AI modules cost more per call than basic connectors, which is why the unit switched.

The moat is the pricing model, not the tool itself. Where Zapier charges per step of a multi-step workflow, Make charges per operation at roughly a third the cost. Complex scenarios stay affordable. The trade-off is a steeper learning curve and a narrower integration library.

When to pick Make

  • Workflows loop or branch more than twice. Routers and iterators are first-class. Zapier Paths feel bolted on past 3-4 branches.
  • Monthly task volume passes 5,000. Zapier task pricing inflates fast. Make’s Core plan covers 10,000 credits for $9 after the May 2026 cut.
  • AI sits inside the workflow. Native OpenAI frontier models, Claude Opus 4.7, and Gemini 3.1 Pro modules handle text generation, classification, and extraction without webhook gymnastics.
  • The operator is technical but not a developer. The canvas assumes comfort with data structures and conditional logic, not code.
  • Predictable cost matters. Credit pricing stays flat as the workflow grows. Per-task models punish every new step.

When to pick something else

  • Maximum integration breadth: Zapier ships 9,000+ apps, more than four times Make’s count. Long-tail SaaS tools are usually on Zapier first.
  • Self-hosting or data residency: n8n. Free to self-host with unlimited executions.
  • LangChain-native LLM pipelines: Langflow. Visual canvas for RAG, multi-agent, and retrieval chains.
  • Customer-facing conversational agents: Voiceflow. Built for support and voice, not ops workflows.
  • Non-technical first-time users: Zapier. Lower learning curve, AI Copilot builds flows from prompts.

Pricing

Subscription pricing via make.com/pricing. Annual billing saves roughly 15% over monthly rates.

PlanMonthlyCreditsKey limitsWho’s it for
Free$01,000/mo2 active scenarios, 15-min intervalTesting
Core$910,000/moUnlimited scenarios, 1-min intervalMost teams land here
Pro$1610,000/moPriority execution, custom variables, full-text log searchGrowing ops
Teams$2910,000/moTeam management, shared scenarios, rolesCollaborative teams
EnterpriseCustomCustomSSO, 24/7 support, enterprise apps, governance, Value Engineering teamRegulated orgs

Prices verified 2026-05-13 via Make pricing. May 2026 cut: Core $10.59 to $9, Pro $18.82 to $16, Teams $34.12 to $29. Additional credits remain available as add-ons. Credits replaced operations as the billing unit in August 2025.

Against the alternatives

MakeZapiern8n
Integration count2,000+9,000+500+
Pricing modelCredits (per module action)Tasks (per action)Executions (cloud) or free (self-host)
Cost at 10,000 ops~$9/mo Core~$103.50+/mo CompanyFree self-host
Branching and loopsNative routers and iteratorsPaths on ProfessionalNative
Self-hostNoneNoneYes, free
AI integrationModules for GPT, Claude, GeminiAgents + CentralNative AI Agent nodes
Learning curveModerateLowestSteepest
Best viewed asCost-efficient specialistIncumbent generalistDeveloper-friendly open source

Failure modes

  • Interface lag on large scenarios. Canvases with 50+ modules slow the browser. Heavy users split long scenarios into sub-flows.
  • Fewer integrations than Zapier. 2,000+ covers mainstream SaaS. Niche tools may need HTTP modules and hand-built OAuth.
  • AI modules burn credits faster. A single OpenAI frontier models call can consume several credits. Credit forecasts built on non-AI modules underestimate real cost.
  • Credits model is newer than many guides. Content published before August 2025 still references operations. Plan sizing needs to use current pricing, not old articles.
  • No native AI agents. Modules call LLMs but do not run autonomous agent loops. n8n ships true AI Agent nodes.
  • Cloud only. No self-host path. Data routes through Make servers.
  • No workflow export to other platforms. Migration to n8n or Zapier is a rebuild.

Methodology

This page was produced by the aipedia.wiki editorial pipeline, an automated system that ingests vendor documentation, verifies pricing and model details against primary sources, and generates the editorial analysis you are reading. No individual human wrote this review. Scoring follows the four-dimension rubric at /about/scoring/ (Utility × Value × Moat × Longevity, unweighted average). Last verified 2026-05-13 against the Make pricing page and Make’s help center billing notes.

FAQ

Is Make free? Yes. The Free plan includes 1,000 credits/month, 2 active scenarios, and 15-minute scheduling intervals. Suitable for testing and light personal automations (Make pricing).

How much does Make cost at scale? Core is $9/mo for 10,000 credits after the May 2026 price cut. Pro is $16/mo adding priority execution and custom variables. Teams is $29/mo for collaboration. Enterprise is custom (Make pricing).

Make vs Zapier? Make costs roughly a third of Zapier at equivalent volume. Zapier ships 9,000+ integrations vs Make’s 2,000+. Pick Make for complex workflows and cost efficiency, Zapier for maximum app coverage and simpler setup.

What changed with credits? Credits replaced operations as the billing unit in August 2025. AI modules cost more per call than basic connectors, and the credit system accommodates that variance. Plan sizing based on old operations counts may underestimate cost.

Can Make be self-hosted? No. Make is cloud-only. n8n is the standard pick for self-hosted workflow automation.

Sources

Make comparisons

See all →

Reader reviews

Loading…
Share LinkedIn
Was this review helpful?
Embed this score on your site Free. Links back.
Make editorial score badge
<a href="https://aipedia.wiki/tools/make/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://aipedia.wiki/badges/make.svg" alt="Make on aipedia.wiki" width="260" height="72" /></a>
[![Make on aipedia.wiki](https://aipedia.wiki/badges/make.svg)](https://aipedia.wiki/tools/make/)

Badge value auto-updates if the editorial score changes. Attribution via the link is required.

Cite this page For journalists, researchers, and bloggers
According to aipedia.wiki Editorial at aipedia.wiki (https://aipedia.wiki/tools/make/)
aipedia.wiki Editorial. (2026). Make — Editorial Review. aipedia.wiki. Retrieved May 29, 2026, from https://aipedia.wiki/tools/make/
aipedia.wiki Editorial. "Make — Editorial Review." aipedia.wiki, 2026, https://aipedia.wiki/tools/make/. Accessed May 29, 2026.
aipedia.wiki Editorial. 2026. "Make — Editorial Review." aipedia.wiki. https://aipedia.wiki/tools/make/.
@misc{make-editorial-review-2026, author = {{aipedia.wiki Editorial}}, title = {Make — Editorial Review}, year = {2026}, publisher = {aipedia.wiki}, url = {https://aipedia.wiki/tools/make/}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-29} }
Spotted an error or want to share your experience with Make?

Every tool page is re-verified on a recurring cycle, and corrections land faster when readers flag them directly. If you spot a stale fact, a missing capability, or have used Make and want to share what worked or didn't, the editorial desk reviews every message sent through this form.

Email editorial@aipedia.wiki
Report outdated info Help us keep this page accurate