- Flagship / model
- Native AI Agent node with tool calling across supported LLM providers
- Best paid tier
- Community self-host for technical teams; Pro cloud for active production; Business/Enterprise for SSO and scale
- Best for
- Developer-friendly automation, self-hosted workflows, and AI agents with tool calling
n8n vs Make vs Zapier
n8n leads for AI agents and self-hosting. Zapier offers the most integrations. Make provides the lowest cloud pricing. Full comparison updated April 2026.
$0 (self-host) - €667+/month (Business cloud)
Editorial · no paid placements
The contenders
-
n8nWinner Open-source workflow automation with native AI Agent nodes, self-host or cloud. -
Make Visual workflow automation platform (formerly Integromat) with operations-based billing and native LLM modules for branching, loops, and data transformation. -
Zapier The no-code automation incumbent with 9,000+ app integrations, Agents, Tables, Interfaces, Chatbots, and Central for AI-driven orchestration.
Best by use case
For most readers, n8n is the right pick across pricing, feature surface, and team fit.
Try n8nHead to head
Canonical facts
At a glance
Pulled from each tool's verified-fact block. Updates here propagate site-wide from one source.
- Flagship / model
- Make
- Best paid tier
- $0-$29+/month
- Best for
- Make is best for teams that want visual, multi-step automation across SaaS apps, APIs, routers, iterators, and data transformation without owning custom orchestration code.
- Flagship / model
- Zapier AI orchestration across Zaps, Agents, Tables, Interfaces, Chatbots, and Central
- Best paid tier
- Professional for multi-step Zaps and premium apps; Team for collaboration, SSO, and shared governance
- Best for
- No-code SaaS automation across the broadest long-tail app catalog
| Fact | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship / model | Native AI Agent node with tool calling across supported LLM providers | Make | Zapier AI orchestration across Zaps, Agents, Tables, Interfaces, Chatbots, and Central |
| Best paid tier | Community self-host for technical teams; Pro cloud for active production; Business/Enterprise for SSO and scale | $0-$29+/month | Professional for multi-step Zaps and premium apps; Team for collaboration, SSO, and shared governance |
| Best for | Developer-friendly automation, self-hosted workflows, and AI agents with tool calling | Make is best for teams that want visual, multi-step automation across SaaS apps, APIs, routers, iterators, and data transformation without owning custom orchestration code. | No-code SaaS automation across the broadest long-tail app catalog |
n8n, Make, and Zapier remain the leading workflow automation platforms as of April 2026. n8n provides open-source self-hosting with unlimited executions at no cost, cloud plans from $20 monthly for 2,500 executions, and native AI agent support including tool use and RAG (n8n Pricing). Make delivers visual workflow design starting at $9 monthly for 10,000 operations (Make Pricing). Zapier maintains over 6,000 integrations with plans from $20 monthly for 750 tasks up to $299 for higher volumes (Zapier Pricing).
Quick Answer
Select n8n for AI agents or self-hosting with unlimited automations. Select Zapier for broad integrations and simple use. Select Make for visual design at the lowest cloud cost.
Decision Snapshot
| n8n | Make | Zapier | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Free self-host / $20-50/mo cloud | $9-145/mo | Free-$299+/mo |
| Best for | AI agents, self-hosting, complex workflows | Visual design, moderate complexity | Integrations, simple automations |
| Utility | 9/10 | 8/10 | 8/10 |
| Value | 10/10 | 8/10 | 6/10 |
| Moat | 7/10 | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Longevity | 9/10 | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Where n8n Wins
- Self-hosting allows unlimited workflows and executions on user infrastructure at zero cost (n8n Docs).
- pipelines, and multi-agent setups with models like OpenAI GPT-5.3, Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7, and Ollama.
- Full code access with JavaScript and Python nodes handles complex logic, loops, and error handling.
- Git integration enables version control for workflows.
- Active open-source community contributes over 900 nodes.
Where Make Wins
- Lowest cloud entry at $9 monthly for 10,000 operations and 2 scenarios.
- Visual canvas supports branching, sub-scenarios, and moderate complexity without code.
- Over 700 native integrations cover common SaaS tools.
- Unlimited scenarios on Pro plan from $16 monthly.
- Good documentation and template library for quick starts.
Where Zapier Wins
- Largest catalog with 6,000+ native app integrations for niche tools.
- Simplest interface for non-technical users with abundant templates.
- Extensive community and documentation.
- Paths and filters handle basic branching.
- Established enterprise adoption reduces switching costs.
Key Differences
n8n excels in technical flexibility and AI features but requires coding skills; its self-hosting avoids per-execution fees, unlike cloud-only Make and Zapier. Make balances visual design and cost for mid-level needs, with more operations per dollar than Zapier. Zapier prioritizes integration breadth and ease, though task limits make it costlier at scale. AI support is strongest in n8n, basic in others. Workflow complexity peaks with n8n’s debugging and code, followed by Make, then Zapier.
Who should choose n8n
Technical users building AI agents, needing self-hosting for privacy or unlimited scale, or handling complex code-based workflows.
Who should choose Make
Users seeking visual builders for moderate complexity at low cloud cost, with standard integrations.
Who should choose Zapier
Non-technical users requiring maximum app connections and simple trigger-action setups.
Bottom Line
n8n suits AI and technical automation due to self-hosting and agent tools. Make offers value for visual cloud workflows. Zapier fits broad, easy integrations despite higher costs. Trends favor n8n for AI growth, Zapier for no-code markets.
FAQ
Is n8n better than Zapier? n8n serves technical needs with AI agents, self-hosting, and complexity. Zapier fits non-technical users with 6,000+ integrations.
Is n8n or Make cheaper? n8n self-hosts free with unlimited use; cloud starts at $20 for 2,500 executions. Make cloud begins at $9 for 10,000 operations.
Which handles AI agents best?, memory, and models like GPT-5.3 or Claude Opus 4.7. Others offer basic LLM steps.
Sources
- n8n official site: https://n8n.io
- Make official site: https://make.com
- Zapier official site: https://zapier.com
Compare next
Updated May 27, 2026: compare Lindy, Zapier, and n8n for inbox/calendar AI assistant work, no-code SaaS automation, technical workflows, pricing units, and which one to buy first.
Honest head-to-head of Apollo.io and Make as of April 2026. Flagship models, current pricing, and which tool fits your workflow.
Start from these contenders and adjust the tool set.
Spotted an error or want to share your experience with n8n vs Make vs Zapier?
Every tool page is re-verified on a recurring cycle, and corrections land faster when readers flag them directly. If you spot a stale fact, a missing capability, or have used n8n vs Make vs Zapier and want to share what worked or didn't, the editorial desk reviews every message sent through this form.
Email editorial@aipedia.wiki