Skip to main content
Tool Chatbots freemium active 8-8.9
8.8/10 Strong
Active

Free 30 req/min / paid usage-based

Best plan

Free 30 req/min / paid usage-based

Watch out: Benchmark Groq on your own prompts for latency, context length, model quality, rate limits, and fallback strategy rather than buying only on speed positioning

Try Groq free

Editorial · no paid placements

The call

Groq is the LPU inference provider, not xAI's Grok chatbot. The June 2026 buyer case is still speed and predictable API economics for supported open models: free-tier prototyping, paid usage-based pricing, prompt caching, and Batch API discounts. Pick it for latency-critical open-model workloads; skip it when you need a closed frontier model from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google.

  • Buy if Latency-sensitive LLM workloads
  • Pick Free 30 req/min / paid usage-based
  • Skip if Users who need frontier-proprietary models from OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google

Evidence rail

Why this recommendation is trusted

Source
Registered source
Freshness
Aging
Confidence
Medium confidence
Verified
Review
Volatility
Volatile

Evidence is approaching its review window.

Build comparison
Watch out
Benchmark Groq on your own prompts for latency, context length, model quality, rate limits, and fallback strategy rather than buying only on speed positioning.

Editorial score

Unweighted average of 4 axes · confidence high

  • Utility 9/10

    How much real work it can do for a competent operator, end to end.

  • Value 9/10

    What you get for the dollar relative to the closest alternative.

  • Moat 9/10

    How hard it would be for a competitor to replicate the underlying advantage.

  • Longevity 8/10

    How likely the product is to still be best-in-class 24 months out.

Key facts

  1. Best For Best for developers who need very low-latency hosted inference for supported open models through an API, with current catalog checks across Llama, Qwen, Whisper, DeepSeek, and OpenAI-compatible GPT OSS routes.
    high Drifts 2026-06-12 Groq official site
  2. Pricing Anchor As of June 12, 2026, Llama 4 Scout runs $0.11/$0.34, Llama 3.1 8B Instant $0.05/$0.08, Llama 3.3 70B Versatile $0.59/$0.79, Qwen3 32B $0.29/$0.59, and GPT OSS 20B $0.075/$0.30 per million tokens; prompt caching gives 50 percent off cached inputs and Batch API gives 50 percent off async workloads.
    high Volatile 2026-06-12 Groq pricing
  3. Watch Out For Benchmark Groq on your own prompts for latency, context length, model quality, rate limits, and fallback strategy rather than buying only on speed positioning.
    high Volatile 2026-06-12 Groq supported models
  4. Api Available Groq is API-first; the docs define authentication, chat/completions behavior, streaming, tool use, and production integration assumptions.
    high Drifts 2026-06-12 Groq docs
  5. Model Control The June 2026 supported-models page should be treated as the source of truth because model IDs, production/preview status, context windows, and deprecations move quickly.
    high Volatile 2026-06-12 Groq supported models

Not to be confused with Grok (xAI’s chatbot, different company, different product). This page is Groq, the LPU inference provider.

One of the fastest LLM providers on the market in 2026. Custom silicon called the Language Processing Unit (LPU) is optimized for low-latency model serving, and Groq’s API exposes supported open models through an OpenAI-compatible developer surface.

System Verdict

Pick Groq if your workload is latency-sensitive. Real-time voice agents, streaming chat interfaces, interactive AI applications all feel qualitatively different at 500+ tokens/second. You notice the speed the first time you try it.

Skip Groq if you need frontier proprietary models. Groq serves supported open and open-compatible model routes. For the newest closed frontier ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini models, go to the source provider.

The 2026 context: Open-weight flagships have closed the gap on many tasks, but quality still varies by job. Groq’s edge is not “best model”; it is fast serving, simple API migration, and lower-latency economics for the open models it supports.

Key Facts

Free tier30 requests/min, 6,000 tokens/min, 14,400 requests/day
Developer tier10x free rate limits, 25 percent discount on tokens
Llama 4 Scout 17B$0.11 input / $0.34 output per M tokens (594 TPS)
Llama 3.3 70B Versatile$0.59 input / $0.79 output per M tokens (394 TPS)
Llama 3.1 8B Instant$0.05 input / $0.08 output per M tokens (840 TPS)
Qwen3 32B$0.29 input / $0.59 output per M tokens (662 TPS)
GPT OSS 20B$0.075 input / $0.30 output per M tokens (1,000 TPS)
GPT OSS 120B$0.15 input / $0.60 output per M tokens (500 TPS)
SpeedUp to 1,000 tokens/second on GPT OSS 20B; 394 to 840 TPS on Llama-family models
HardwareCustom LPU (Language Processing Unit) silicon
Batch API50 percent discount for non-real-time workloads (24h to 7d windows)
Prompt caching50 percent off cached input tokens, no extra caching fee

When to pick Groq

  • Real-time voice applications. Users feel sub-200ms response times. Groq’s streaming LLM inference makes this achievable with open-weight models.
  • Streaming chat interfaces. Token streaming that displays in real time. On Groq, the full response often lands before the user finishes reading the first line.
  • Production apps scaling open-weight. Low per-token pricing plus low latency can create strong unit economics for Llama, Qwen, Whisper, DeepSeek, and compatible open-model deployments.
  • Agent loops with tight latency budgets. Multi-step agent workflows where each LLM call must return fast to meet overall SLA.

When to pick something else

  • Frontier proprietary quality: Go direct to OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google.
  • Max model variety: Fal.ai (600+ models) or Fireworks AI (400+ models) for broader catalog.
  • Long-context workflows: Groq supports long context on supported models but caps below frontier API offerings.
  • Consumer chat UI: Groq is API-first. Use Ollama + a chat UI or ChatGPT for consumer workflows.

Pricing

Pricing is per-token and predictable.

ModelInput $/M tokensOutput $/M tokensSpeed (TPS)
Llama 3.1 8B Instant$0.05$0.08840
GPT OSS 20B$0.075$0.301,000
Llama 4 Scout 17B$0.11$0.34594
GPT OSS 120B$0.15$0.60500
Qwen3 32B$0.29$0.59662
Llama 3.3 70B Versatile$0.59$0.79394

Rate tiers: Free (30 req/min, 14,400/day). Developer (10x free + 25 percent off). Enterprise (custom). Batch API: 50 percent off for 24-hour to 7-day windows. Prompt caching: 50 percent off cached input tokens with no extra caching fee.

Verified 2026-06-12 via groq.com/pricing and Groq supported models.

Failure modes

  • Open-weight only. Groq hosts open-weight models including OpenAI’s GPT OSS 20B and 120B, but no frontier ChatGPT, no Claude, no Gemini. If your product needs a closed frontier model, Groq is complementary, not a replacement.
  • Free tier rate limits bite. 30 req/min is enough for prototyping, not production. Plan upgrade.
  • Model catalog is narrower than FLUX marketplaces. Curated selection of flagship open-weight models, not every model on Hugging Face.
  • Model catalog changes. Groq’s supported-model table includes production and preview routes; check model IDs, deprecations, context limits, and rate limits before pinning a production workload.
  • LPU geography is limited. Not globally distributed in 2026 at the level of AWS or GCP. Latency is great near a Groq region, less great far from one.

Against the alternatives

GroqFireworks AITogether AIOpenAI
Speed (tok/sec)394 to 1,00050-20050-20050-100
HardwareCustom LPUBlackwell GPUsH100/H200OpenAI infra
Llama 4 Scout input$0.11/M~$0.15/M~$0.20/MN/A
Proprietary modelsNo (open-weight + GPT OSS)NoNoYes
Best forLatency-critical open-weightGeneral open-weight inferenceFine-tuning + hostingFrontier quality

Methodology

Produced by the aipedia.wiki editorial pipeline. Last verified 2026-06-12 against Groq pricing, Groq docs, and Groq supported models.

FAQ

Is Groq the same as Grok? No. Groq (this page) is a hardware-accelerated LLM inference provider founded in 2016. Grok is xAI’s chatbot and API platform launched in 2023. Different companies, different products, easy to confuse because of the single-letter spelling.

Is Groq really 10× faster than other providers? On open-weight models, the LPU hardware delivers 3-10× higher tokens/second than GPU-based providers. Real-world advantage depends on model, context length, and region.

What’s an LPU and how is it different from a GPU?. Unlike GPUs (which are general-purpose matrix-math chips), LPUs are optimized for the specific compute, and lower cost per token on supported models.

Was Groq acquired by Nvidia? AiPedia is not treating acquisition rumors as current buyer facts. Use Groq’s official site, pricing page, and docs for purchase decisions unless Groq or Nvidia publish a primary-source announcement.

Can I run Llama 4 Scout’s 10M context on Groq? Groq supports long context on some models but not always the full 10M. Check current model specs on Groq’s docs; the effective context window varies.

Reader reviews

Loading…
Share LinkedIn
Was this review helpful?
Embed this score on your site Free. Links back.
Groq editorial score badge
<a href="https://aipedia.wiki/tools/groq/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://aipedia.wiki/badges/groq.svg" alt="Groq on aipedia.wiki" width="260" height="72" /></a>
[![Groq on aipedia.wiki](https://aipedia.wiki/badges/groq.svg)](https://aipedia.wiki/tools/groq/)

Badge value auto-updates if the editorial score changes. Attribution via the link is required.

Cite this page For journalists, researchers, and bloggers
According to aipedia.wiki Editorial at aipedia.wiki (https://aipedia.wiki/tools/groq/)
aipedia.wiki Editorial. (2026). Groq: Editorial Review. aipedia.wiki. Retrieved June 22, 2026, from https://aipedia.wiki/tools/groq/
aipedia.wiki Editorial. "Groq: Editorial Review." aipedia.wiki, 2026, https://aipedia.wiki/tools/groq/. Accessed June 22, 2026.
aipedia.wiki Editorial. 2026. "Groq: Editorial Review." aipedia.wiki. https://aipedia.wiki/tools/groq/.
@misc{groq-editorial-review-2026, author = {{aipedia.wiki Editorial}}, title = {Groq: Editorial Review}, year = {2026}, publisher = {aipedia.wiki}, url = {https://aipedia.wiki/tools/groq/}, note = {Accessed: 2026-06-22} }
Spotted an error or want to share your experience with Groq?

Every tool page is re-verified on a recurring cycle, and corrections land faster when readers flag them directly. If you spot a stale fact, a missing capability, or have used Groq and want to share what worked or didn't, the editorial desk reviews every message sent through this form.

Email editorial@aipedia.wiki
Report outdated info Help us keep this page accurate